Colorado Well Finder › Wells by county › Jefferson County › Lakeside
A shallow well record near Lakeside does not necessarily tell you what a household well will require. Monitoring accounts for 55% of permitted uses in this dataset, so the local depth and cost figures need careful interpretation.
These figures cover Colorado DWR permit records within 5 miles of Lakeside, including nearby Mountain View, Edgewater and Wheat Ridge. Use them to screen a property and prepare questions for a driller—not as proof that a particular lot has a usable residential water supply.
Figures are computed from Colorado Division of Water Resources permit records for permitted wells within 5 miles of Lakeside. Not every permit reports every field; each statistic uses the wells that report it.
| Depth statistic | Feet |
|---|---|
| 25th percentile | 20 |
| Median | 29 |
| 75th percentile | 50 |
| 90th percentile | 135 |
| Deepest on record | 1,751 |
| Aquifer named on permits | Wells |
|---|---|
| unnamed / fractured-bedrock aquifer | 9,059 |
| Alluvial | 547 |
| Quaternary Alluvium | 258 |
| Yield statistic | gpm |
|---|---|
| 25th percentile | 8.0 |
| Median | 12.0 |
| 75th percentile | 15.0 |
| Median depth to water | 13 ft |
| Median water level by decade | Depth to water |
|---|---|
| 1950s | 15 ft |
| 1960s | 18 ft |
| 2010s | 13 ft |
| 2020s | 13 ft |
Among the 6,226 records reporting depth, the median is 29 ft and the middle half runs 20-50 ft. That puts the center of the recorded work in shallow ground, but this is not a household-well-only sample. With monitoring uses prominent, a residential bid should not simply assume the median depth.
Reported depths are under 100 ft in 87% of records; the 90th percentile is 135 ft. Permits name Alluvial and Quaternary Alluvium alongside unnamed or fractured-bedrock aquifers. That mix makes nearby construction logs more useful than a broad regional label. Ask the driller which formation would supply your lot and whether comparable household wells support the proposed drilling depth.
The reported pump-yield median is 12.0 gpm, with the middle half at 8.0-15.0 gpm. Those figures suggest useful household production among the tested wells, but only 309 records report yield. That is a limited window into a much larger permit inventory, not a promise for an untested property.
3% report under 1 gpm, while 8% fall in the 1-5 gpm category. For a buyer, that makes a current pumping and recovery test worth arranging before closing. Low production can require storage and careful demand management. A permit’s reported pump yield does not establish sustained output, water quality, or permission to irrigate the lot.
Static water level is the resting depth to water, not the total hole depth or the level while pumping. Across 198 reporting records, the median is 13 ft below ground, and the middle half is 10-20 ft. A shallow resting level does not by itself establish a productive well.
The decade medians are 15 ft in the 1950s, 18 ft in the 1960s, and 13 ft in both the 2010s and 2020s. These summaries do not show a steadily dropping water table. They also are not repeated measurements of the same wells. For a Lakeside purchase, compare the subject well’s current resting and pumping levels with its own earlier records where available.
The search area contains 11,455 permit records, with 5,546 recorded as constructed. Permits are not a count of functioning household supplies: domestic/household uses account for 26%, compared with 55% monitoring. Issuance reached 2,198 in the 2000s; the newest permit year is 2025.
The most active recorded entry is Authorized (Pe, Pg), with 3,900 records. That reads as an authorization label rather than a conventional company name. Named drillers include Layne, Christensen Co. (Tormoehlen, David A.) with 191 and Ground Exploration Llc (Bender, Joseph T.) with 145. Historical activity does not establish current availability or residential drilling suitability.
The supplied cost model assumes Denver Basin sedimentary bedrock at $50-$70 per foot. At the recorded median depth, it estimates $1,400-$2,000 for the drilled hole and $7,400-$14,000 for a finished well with pump, tank, trenching and electrical.
Treat that as a preliminary model, not a Lakeside residential quote. The shallow median comes from mixed-use records, and the formation and required completion depth on your parcel may differ. Ask for an itemized bid covering casing, grout, well development, testing and equipment, with exclusions stated plainly. Confirm how access, utility routing and unsuccessful drilling would be charged before committing. A low drilling-only price is not the installed water-system cost.
The environmental map identifies 663 PFAS sampling/contamination sites, 192 EPA Superfund/cleanup sites and 92 historic mine features within about 10 miles. Those are screening locations, not proof that a particular well is contaminated. Sampling sites should not automatically be treated as confirmed contamination.
Review nearby site records and have the actual well water tested, with the testing scope informed by local conditions. Inspect casing, grout and the wellhead for routes that could let surface water enter. A recorded yield cannot rule out later supply problems, and nearby wells cannot guarantee a successful hole. If septic is proposed, coordinate its approved location with the well, building footprint, drainage and drilling access before finalizing the site plan.
Start with the parcel’s actual water-service options and DWR permit status. Do not assume that a nearby well means a new household permit is available, or that an existing permit allows outdoor watering. Exempt household-use permits have use restrictions; other proposed uses may require a different permitting path or augmentation.
For an existing well, request the permit, completion report, pump records, water-quality results and a current production test. For vacant land, compare household-well logs around Mountain View, Edgewater and Wheat Ridge, favoring similar ground over simple proximity. Then have the driller and site contractor coordinate access, the well location, utility trenches and any septic layout before you commit to the building footprint.
| Decade permitted | Wells |
|---|---|
| 1950s | 324 |
| 1960s | 387 |
| 1970s | 490 |
| 1980s | 523 |
| 1990s | 2,159 |
| 2000s | 2,198 |
| 2010s | 1,704 |
| 2020s | 859 |
| Most active drillers on record | Wells |
|---|---|
| Authorized (Pe, Pg) | 3,900 |
| Layne, Christensen Co. (Tormoehlen, David A.) | 191 |
| Ground Exploration Llc (Bender, Joseph T.) | 145 |
How this is built: the median permitted depth here times the per-foot range for this ground, plus the normal system costs. A lot at the 75th-percentile depth (50 ft) would run roughly $8,500–$15,500. See the full Colorado well cost guide.
Counts come from EPA, USGS and state datasets layered on the Colorado Well Finder map. A count is not a verdict on any one well; it tells you what to test for.
The numbers above are the area average. Your lot is one point on the map. Search the address to see the real depth, yield and aquifer of each permitted well around it.
Map wells near LakesideFor a Lakeside lot, Tri-Lakes Contracting is a licensed Colorado contractor for access driveways, site development, new-build septic systems and custom homes. Coordinate the well location with access, utilities and any proposed septic layout before settling the building footprint.
Licensed Colorado custom home builder · licensed driveway & excavation contractor · licensed septic installer
A listing photo can't tell you whether a lot is a dream or a money pit. Two parcels near Lakeside can carry the same asking price while one needs an $80,000 driveway and a $45,000 engineered septic the other doesn't. The well numbers on this page are the start of that answer. A Tri-Lakes Site Feasibility Report is the rest of it: a licensed general contractor, excavator and septic installer reads the parcel the way we would if we were about to build on it, and puts the real cost in writing before your money is committed.
Spend a little to know. Or gamble a lot to guess. Realtors sell the view and inspectors look at houses that already exist. We're the people who'd build it, so we catch what quietly turns a "great deal" into a budget disaster: bad access, buried rock, steep grade, soil that won't pass for a normal septic, water that's a fortune to reach. And if the lot is good, you've already got a builder ready to do the work, driveway to drywall.
Under contract, comparing parcels, or a realtor with a rural listing whose buyers keep asking "what will it cost to build here?" This is the due-diligence step almost everyone skips, and the one that saves the most.
Driveway, site work, septic or a build near Lakeside. Licensed GC, excavator and septic installer.
Got it. Tri-Lakes will get back to you shortly.
Something went wrong sending that. Email kyle@trilakes.co instead.
Within 5 miles of Lakeside, recorded wells have a median depth of 29 ft, with the middle half at 20-50 ft. However, monitoring accounts for 55% of permitted uses, so these figures are not a residential drilling-depth forecast. Compare nearby household-well completion reports and formations before using the median to budget a new well.
The supplied model uses $50-$70 per foot for Denver Basin sedimentary bedrock. At the 29 ft median depth, the hole is estimated at $1,400-$2,000, while a finished system with pump, tank, trenching and electrical is $7,400-$14,000. Mixed-use records make that median a weak residential assumption, so get a parcel-specific, itemized quote.
The 309 records reporting pump yield have a median of 12.0 gpm, with the middle half at 8.0-15.0 gpm. Reported yields under 1 gpm account for 3%. Those results help frame expectations, but a current pumping and recovery test is more useful for buying an existing home than a neighborhood median.
The permit statistics cannot establish drinking-water safety. Within about 10 miles, the map lists 663 PFAS sampling/contamination sites and 192 EPA Superfund/cleanup sites. Proximity alone does not prove a well is affected, and a sampling location is not necessarily contaminated. Review relevant site information and test the property’s water before relying on it.
The reported decade medians do not show a steady decline: depth to water was 15 ft in the 1950s, 18 ft in the 1960s, and 13 ft in both the 2010s and 2020s. These are grouped records, not a continuous monitoring series. Check the individual well’s measurement history and current pumping response before drawing conclusions.
All wells in Jefferson County — county-wide depth, yield and cost figures.
Driveway, septic, site development, feasibility or a custom build near Lakeside.
Shopping a lot? Run the $99 instant buildability check →